Skip to main content
Paul Welty, PhD AI, WORK, AND STAYING HUMAN

· business · professional-skills · 3 min read

Make yourself obsolete

Make yourself obsolete

If you’re not trying to eliminate your own job, you’re not paying attention.

If you’re not trying to eliminate your own job, you’re not paying attention. The tasks you’re clinging to—half of them shouldn’t exist. The other half could be done by someone or something else.

Your job isn’t to be necessary. It’s to be useful. Those aren’t the same thing.

Most people work in the opposite direction. They accumulate responsibilities, protect their territory, make themselves hard to replace. That feels like security. It’s actually fragility. The more your value depends on tasks only you can do, the more brittle your position becomes—and the less room you have to grow into work that actually matters.

The question isn’t whether your job will change. It will. The question is whether you’ll be the one who changes it, or whether change will happen to you.

Making yourself obsolete doesn’t mean making yourself irrelevant. It means continually moving toward higher-value work by automating, delegating, or eliminating the work that no longer requires you. The person who can’t be replaced also can’t be promoted. They’ve become load-bearing. They’re stuck.

This requires a different kind of honesty than most people practice. You have to look at your calendar, your habits, your recurring tasks, and ask uncomfortable questions. Could someone else do this just as well? Could a tool do it better? Does this need to be done at all? And the hardest one: am I holding onto this because it matters, or because it makes me feel valuable?

The emotional resistance is real. Tasks become identity. Expertise becomes ego. Letting go of work you’ve mastered feels like giving something away. But hoarding tasks you’ve outgrown isn’t loyalty to the organization. It’s protection of self-image at the expense of contribution.

The goal is to always be working yourself out of your current role and into the next one. Not by climbing, but by clearing. You create space by finishing things, handing things off, and refusing to let your job description calcify around what you happened to be doing last year.

This isn’t just personal strategy. It’s organizational ethics. Every hour you spend on work someone else could do is an hour unavailable for work only you can do. That’s a resource allocation problem—and you’re the one creating it.

If your value depends on being the only one who can do something, you haven’t built value. You’ve built a trap. Get out of it before someone else dismantles it for you.

The practice

  • Regularly ask yourself: what am I doing this week that someone else could do, that could be automated, or that doesn’t need to happen at all? Be honest. Then act on the answer—hand it off, build the system, or stop doing it entirely.
  • Ask the people above you: what’s on your plate that you’d love to get rid of? That’s where your next challenge lives.
  • Ask the people below you the same question about your plate.
  • Make it normal to move work toward whoever can handle it best.

The agent-shaped org chart

Every real org has the same topology: principal, role-holder, specialists. Staff AI maps onto it, node for node, and the cost collapse shows up in the deliverables that were always just human-handoff overhead.

AI as staff, not software

Two frames for what AI is doing to work. The tool frame makes tools smarter. The staff frame makes roles unnecessary. Those aren't the same product, the same company, or the same industry.

Knowledge work was never work

Knowledge work was always coordination between humans who couldn't share state directly. The artifacts were never the work. They were the overhead — and AI just made the overhead optional.

The work of being available now

A book on AI, judgment, and staying human at work.

The practice of work in progress

Practical essays on how work actually gets done.

How do I get my dev team to adopt AI?

A stub on helping mixed-interest development teams find their own useful ways into AI.

Want to learn about agents? Talk to someone who ran an agency.

I spent 20 years running consulting engagements at Fortune 500 companies. Turns out that's the best preparation for running a fleet of AI agents ... because the problems are identical.

Your AI agents need a water cooler

We run a twelve-session AI fleet that coordinates through an IRC breakroom. A friend asked: why are you making AI agents act like humans? The answer turned out to be more interesting than the question.

Start with purpose

Transform your work by prioritizing purpose over tasks. Discover how focusing on time and intention leads to greater impact and fulfillment.

"I don't know" is never an excuse: Make an assumption and document it

Transform uncertainty into action by making reasonable assumptions and documenting them. Embrace decision-making for progress without perfect information.

When teaching stops being bounded

AI removes the constraints that gave teaching its shape—one teacher, thirty students, limited time. But lifting constraints doesn't make the work easier. It makes it different. Teachers trained for a bounded classroom now face an unbounded role that requires judgment, discernment, and presence in ways we haven't yet mapped.