The Semiotics of Networked Content
Working on content interop super-ontology in the #mastodon, #micro.blog, #twitter, #feedland, and #wordpress multiverse.
Posts are actual pieces of content. They are mostly made on the platform where you find them.
Timelines are views into (yours and others’) posts. These views are made possible by transmitting information about the post via #RSS (or something else) and aggregating into a timeline. Timelines can include feeds from yours or others’ sources.
What’s interesting is that timelines can also be published and consumed, also via #rss.
This means that, if you consume a feed, you don’t know if the source-content in the feed originates with that feed. Feed elements could “pass through” as signs to their sources. In fact, it doesn’t even matter.
In this sense, we don’t want to replicate content around the networks, we want to replicate signs.
Related Posts
ActivityPub spec
I’ve been reading this today to learn how one writes specs … https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/
The Ur-post
One thing I’ve been wondering about (in all my musings on #microblogging) is the relationships among sources and references. Earlier, I …
Embracing the AI Workforce
“For employees who miss the spontaneity, knowledge-sharing and freewheeling riffs of the old-world office—but not the hassle of a commute, or a …
